Lative consistency inheight by yearspeedregion, onshoreaand offFigure A4. Annual typical generation
Lative consistency inheight by yearspeedregion, onshoreaand offFigure A4. Annual typical generation profile of wind turbines at 50 m hub diurnal wind and profile during year in shore (.off) areas. Note: The figure demonstrates C2 Ceramide MedChemExpress relative consistency in diurnal wind speed profile for the duration of a year in different regions. distinctive regions.Energies 2021, 14, 7063 Energies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW33 of 57 32 ofFigure five. Annual typical generation profile of wind turbines by year and cluster, onshore and offshore (.off) places. Note: Figure A5. Annual average generation profile diurnal wind speed profile through a onshore and offshore (.off) locations. The figure demonstrates relative consistency inof wind turbines by year and cluster, year in distinct areas (territorial Note: The figure wind clusters). demonstrates relative consistency in diurnal wind speed profile throughout a year in distinctive locations (territorial wind clusters).Energies 2021, 14, 7063 PEER Overview Energies 2021, 14, x FOR34 of 55 33 ofFigure 6. Annual typical diurnal wind speed profiles in MERRA-2 and ERA5 datasets at 50 and one hundred m height (W50M, Figure A6. Annual typical diurnal wind speed profiles in MERRA-2 and ERA5 datasets at 50 and 100 m height (W50M, MERRA-2; W100E, ERA5; W100M. MERRA-2 extrapolated), 2020 climate year. MERRA-2; W100E, ERA5; W100M. MERRA-2 extrapolated), 2020 weather year.Energies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEWEnergies 2021, 14,34 of35 ofEnergies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW34 ofFigure A7. Comparison of month-to-month speed at 100 m height in ERA5 and ERA5 height in ERA5 and MERRA-2 Figure A7. Comparison of Figure 7. average wind of monthly averageat 100 m heightat one hundred m and MERRA-2 (extrapolated from 10 monthly Comparison average wind speed wind speed in MERRA-2 (extrapolated from 10 and 50 m(extrapolated from ten and 50 m heights) datasets. heights) datasets. and 50 m heights) datasets.Figure A8. Solar PV capacity ANG-1 Proteins Molecular Weight components (1980020 average) with potential cumulative capacity by cluster, assuming 1 use of territory of every single cluster.Figure A8. Solar PV capacity factors (1980020 average) with possible cumulative capacity byby cluster, assuming 1 use Figure A8. Solar PV capacity aspects (1980020 average) with prospective cumulative capacity cluster, assuming 1 use of of territory of every single cluster. territory of every single cluster.Energies 2021, 14, 7063 FOR PEER Critique Energies 2021, 14, x36 of 35 of 55Figure A9. A9. Wind turbine capacity components (1980020 typical)at distinctive heights with potential cumulative capacity byby Figure Wind turbine capacity components (1980020 typical) at different heights with prospective cumulative capacity cluster, assuming ten use of territory every single cluster. cluster, assuming 10 use of territory of of every single cluster.Figure A10. Estimated solar power supply curve with potential cumulative capacity by cluster, assuming 1 use of territory Figure A10. Estimated solar energy supply curve with potential cumulative capacity by cluster, assuming 1 use of terriof every single cluster. cluster. tory of eachEnergies 2021, 14,37 ofFigure A11. Estimated wind power supply curve with prospective cumulative capacity by cluster, assuming ten use of territory of each and every cluster.Energies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER Overview Energies 2021, 14,37 of 55 38 ofFigure A12. Optimised solar and wind generation capacity by scenario and cluster, demand level equal to 2019 (1.Figure A12. Optimised solar and wind generation capacity by scenario and cluster, demand level equal to 2019 (1.Energies 2021,.
Potassium channel potassiun-channel.com
Just another WordPress site