Admit diverse behaviors that act as symbolic borders. These borders ought to not be blurred,

Admit diverse behaviors that act as symbolic borders. These borders ought to not be blurred, thereby avoiding the introduction of a (reprehensible) element from the street (disease, condom) inside the household space.Prevention methods: “risk groups, woman of your house, and condom”We have observed that minimizing the severity of AIDS did not stop its meaning as a threat. Nevertheless, this threat is bounded by the notion of “risk group” and by the category of “street” (as opposed to “home”). So, it really is in the middle of PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21261711 this range of meaning that the protection approaches, stated by the respondents, acquire sense and orientation leading towards the adoption of exclusive (but unprotected) sex with all the “woman from the house”, or perhaps the use of condoms with “women with the street”. Individuals identified by respondents as belonging to “risk groups” nevertheless refer for the classic groups identified by epidemiologists throughout the initial phase from the epidemic, within the late 1980s: homosexuals, drug users, and sex experts. Respondents exclude “women on the house” and themselves from these groups, indicating low self-perception of threat. She (wife) has the MedChemExpress MCB-613 self-confidence that I am on the road, but alone. And I also have confidence that she also respects me and is alone. (…) We’re not (…) a part of the risk group (…) they’re people today who use drugs (…) with a lot of partners. (r. 10, 51 years old) As a result, avoiding sexual relations with many folks particularly, “prostitutes, women on the street, and fags” restricting them (practically) exclusively for the “woman on the house”, was thought of by respondents as a very good preventive tactic, even if it really is of challenging execution. I assume it prevents [AIDS], after you don’t go out with any lady but the lady of the residence. (…) By way of the woman 1 gets it too, but in the fag is far more assured. (r. 7, 49 years old) Respondents categorize subjects and scenarios, present in their contexts of social interaction, to measure unique degrees of danger. The category “woman from the house” just isn’t limited only towards the wife, also involving women which have distinct attributes with the space on the “house”. This is, for that reason, a “language of relations” (more than substantive attribute!) as Goffman advocates about stigma a language developed within a broader internet of meanings. Among the respondents, by way of example, doesn’t use condoms inside the extramarital relationship using a “girlfriend”. The truth that the “girlfriend” is married to yet another man (taking the place of “woman with the house”), in addition towards the long-term “dating”, justifies for him the unprotected sex. When I’m dating often it passes, without having a condom. But not any person (…) There is a lady … but I know her for nine years (…) From time to time, I do not use condom, no. But if I get a lady I never know, I have to utilize. (…) She’s a married woman. (…) I usually pass by there, I see her all the time. (r. 12, 54 years old) We see that the use of condoms, though not constant, is much more related towards the space on the “street”, as a strategy to meet the so-called “men’s needs” for sex, possibly more present in lengthy routes. Quite a few of the ladies who populate the contexts of social interaction of truck drivers, particularly those involved with sexual service, are viewed as to become “anyone”; thatDOI:ten.1590S1518-8787.Vulnerability of truck drivers to HIVAIDSMagno L Castellanos MEPis, as an individual without bonds and who has no big issues with all the risk of infection by illnesses “rotten women” within the words of a inte.