Uited by children. Finally, findings suggest that taking heed of ideas

Uited by children. Finally, findings suggest that taking heed of ideas of children, especially as it pertains to the motivations of their parents, may itself play an important role in policy planning. They may be more candid or realistic sources for uncovering the actual factors that motivate the decisions or behaviors of the adult population. It should of course be explicitly noted that we are not advocating a shift of the burden for policy direction from adults to kids. Nor are we suggesting that this population of GS-9620 mechanism of action children in Kenya can speak for other countries’ children, who may of course have quite different circumstances. The present study also does of course come with caveats. Children represent a challenging population for survey-based studies, especially regarding a tendency to not understand procedures or questions. See [15, 31, 35] for examples from Kenya. Although this study did use the utmost care in its procedures, following established practice for children, readers should be mindful when considering the findings. The study was also a convenience sample, albeit of a targeted population. Thus, care should be taken in making inferences regarding other children or other countries’ populations. We again in fact suggest against using this paper’s findings as de facto estimates of total rates–i.e., of birth certification. These are better addressed through our earlier adult study. However, especially in fpsyg.2016.01503 a case such as birth registration which does directly touch the lives of students, it might be argued that directly asking for their insights or opinions should at least be one aspect of research.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Plan Kenya for the opportunity to conduct this study as a component of their Universal Birth Registration initiative. This study was also made possible by technical support from Nokia Corporation and Plan Finland. The discussion, suggestions and opinions expressed in the paper, however, are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors will make the data discussed in this study as well as the full survey results available upon written request to the corresponding authors.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: RGW JW HN JGO. Performed the experiments: RGW JW HN JGO. Analyzed the data: MP GOO BKN. Wrote the paper: MP RGW BKN JGO.
Why are some fields more diverse than others? Although many factors are undoubtedly at play, a recent proposal suggests that the fields in which women and African Americans arePLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0150194 March 3,1 /”Brilliant” “Genius” on RateMyProfessors Predict a Field’s Diversityin study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or Nutlin-3a chiralMedChemExpress Nutlin (3a) preparation of the manuscript. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.underrepresented (e.g., physics, philosophy) are those fields whose members believe that a spark of brilliance is required for success [1]. The belief in the importance of untutored genius may be detrimental to the involvement of women and African Americans because of broad cultural stereotypes that portray the intellectual abilities of these groups in a negative light (e.g., [2, 3]). Consistent with this Field-specific Ability Beliefs (FAB) hypothesis, a recent survey of academics across 30 SART.S23503 disciplines found that fields with a stronger focus on brilliance were also less diverse ([1, 4], see also [5]). In the present research, we examined this relationship using a d.Uited by children. Finally, findings suggest that taking heed of ideas of children, especially as it pertains to the motivations of their parents, may itself play an important role in policy planning. They may be more candid or realistic sources for uncovering the actual factors that motivate the decisions or behaviors of the adult population. It should of course be explicitly noted that we are not advocating a shift of the burden for policy direction from adults to kids. Nor are we suggesting that this population of children in Kenya can speak for other countries’ children, who may of course have quite different circumstances. The present study also does of course come with caveats. Children represent a challenging population for survey-based studies, especially regarding a tendency to not understand procedures or questions. See [15, 31, 35] for examples from Kenya. Although this study did use the utmost care in its procedures, following established practice for children, readers should be mindful when considering the findings. The study was also a convenience sample, albeit of a targeted population. Thus, care should be taken in making inferences regarding other children or other countries’ populations. We again in fact suggest against using this paper’s findings as de facto estimates of total rates–i.e., of birth certification. These are better addressed through our earlier adult study. However, especially in fpsyg.2016.01503 a case such as birth registration which does directly touch the lives of students, it might be argued that directly asking for their insights or opinions should at least be one aspect of research.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Plan Kenya for the opportunity to conduct this study as a component of their Universal Birth Registration initiative. This study was also made possible by technical support from Nokia Corporation and Plan Finland. The discussion, suggestions and opinions expressed in the paper, however, are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors will make the data discussed in this study as well as the full survey results available upon written request to the corresponding authors.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: RGW JW HN JGO. Performed the experiments: RGW JW HN JGO. Analyzed the data: MP GOO BKN. Wrote the paper: MP RGW BKN JGO.
Why are some fields more diverse than others? Although many factors are undoubtedly at play, a recent proposal suggests that the fields in which women and African Americans arePLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0150194 March 3,1 /”Brilliant” “Genius” on RateMyProfessors Predict a Field’s Diversityin study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.underrepresented (e.g., physics, philosophy) are those fields whose members believe that a spark of brilliance is required for success [1]. The belief in the importance of untutored genius may be detrimental to the involvement of women and African Americans because of broad cultural stereotypes that portray the intellectual abilities of these groups in a negative light (e.g., [2, 3]). Consistent with this Field-specific Ability Beliefs (FAB) hypothesis, a recent survey of academics across 30 SART.S23503 disciplines found that fields with a stronger focus on brilliance were also less diverse ([1, 4], see also [5]). In the present research, we examined this relationship using a d.