M comments (4.62 IPI/kU, SD 5.41), Google+ “+1″s (4.02 IPI/kU, SD 5.54) and

M comments (4.62 IPI/kU, SD 5.41), Google+ “+1″s (4.02 IPI/kU, SD 5.54) and Google+ clickthroughs (1.47 IPI/kU, SD 2.98) (Fig 2B). Visit durations and retention rates were highest for buy Disitertide FPS-ZM1.html”>purchase FPS-ZM1 Twitter French, with users spending 34.63 seconds on average (SD 46.42), and 10.92 (SD 12.97 ) clicking on on-site links, respectively. Audience size correlated significantly and moderately positively with total shares and clickthroughs, and weakly negatively for visit duration (r = -0.146, p < 0.01) and retention rate (r = -0.175, p < 0.01). No significant correlation was found between audience size and total likes or comments. However, when controlling for audience size, likes, comments, shares and clickthroughs occurred less often as audience sizes grew. Correlations were moderately negative except for the correlation between audience size and likes, which was strongly negative (Fig 2C). In summary, larger audiences correlated with higher engagement rates in total; However, per-user, engagement declined with audience size. Having said that, audience size is not everything. The educational goals of visit durations and retention rates (Table 1, row 1) were similarly attained among Twitter English, Facebook and Google+ although they have very different audience sizes, while users arriving to the URLs through Twitter French stay on the page for a much longer time, by a factor of 2 to 3 (Fig 2D and 2E). This may be a result of the language itself: to convey the same information takes, in general, more words in French than in English [42]. In English, 140 characters can be enough to convey a message. In French, this is not always the case, resulting in enigmatic text that encourages the reader to click through to find out more. Once on the webpage, more French text is used to convey the message than the equivalent English so naturally the time spent on the page increases. If the web page content is tailored to the audience e.g. a full publication in French, the audience is more likely to click further to read additional content.PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0156409 May 27,9 /Engagement with Particle Physics on CERN's Social Media PlatformsFig 2. Average rates of user interactions with items posted on CERN's social media platforms. (A) User interaction rates without control for audience size. (B) User interaction rates with control for audience size. (C) Pearson correlations between audience size and user interactions relating to behaviours on the social media platform. (D) Visit durations of visitors arriving by links posted on different platforms, by audience sizes of the platforms. (E) Average retention rates of visitors arriving by links posted on different platforms, by audience sizes of the platforms. (F) Pearson correlations between audience size and user interactions relating to on-site behaviour. *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Error bars denote the standard error of the mean. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156409.gPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0156409 May 27,10 /Engagement with Particle Physics on CERN's Social Media PlatformsTable 7. User interactions per item with CERN items on different social media platforms, by item type. Item Type GWII Mean N SD News Mean N SD TBT Mean N SD Wow Mean N SD Total Mean N SD 161.68 214 358.81 9.50 214 31.93 64.37 182 143.79 93.08 225 166.11 16.27 225 34.67 5.45 225 8.20 285.93 40 703.74 17.20 40 63.27 115.88 32 244.12 14.M comments (4.62 IPI/kU, SD 5.41), Google+ "+1"s (4.02 IPI/kU, SD 5.54) and Google+ clickthroughs (1.47 IPI/kU, SD 2.98) (Fig 2B). Visit durations and retention rates were highest for Twitter French, with users spending 34.63 seconds on average (SD 46.42), and 10.92 (SD 12.97 ) clicking on on-site links, respectively. Audience size correlated significantly and moderately positively with total shares and clickthroughs, and weakly negatively for visit duration (r = -0.146, p < 0.01) and retention rate (r = -0.175, p < 0.01). No significant correlation was found between audience size and total likes or comments. However, when controlling for audience size, likes, comments, shares and clickthroughs occurred less often as audience sizes grew. Correlations were moderately negative except for the correlation between audience size and likes, which was strongly negative (Fig 2C). In summary, larger audiences correlated with higher engagement rates in total; However, per-user, engagement declined with audience size. Having said that, audience size is not everything. The educational goals of visit durations and retention rates (Table 1, row 1) were similarly attained among Twitter English, Facebook and Google+ although they have very different audience sizes, while users arriving to the URLs through Twitter French stay on the page for a much longer time, by a factor of 2 to 3 (Fig 2D and 2E). This may be a result of the language itself: to convey the same information takes, in general, more words in French than in English [42]. In English, 140 characters can be enough to convey a message. In French, this is not always the case, resulting in enigmatic text that encourages the reader to click through to find out more. Once on the webpage, more French text is used to convey the message than the equivalent English so naturally the time spent on the page increases. If the web page content is tailored to the audience e.g. a full publication in French, the audience is more likely to click further to read additional content.PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0156409 May 27,9 /Engagement with Particle Physics on CERN's Social Media PlatformsFig 2. Average rates of user interactions with items posted on CERN's social media platforms. (A) User interaction rates without control for audience size. (B) User interaction rates with control for audience size. (C) Pearson correlations between audience size and user interactions relating to behaviours on the social media platform. (D) Visit durations of visitors arriving by links posted on different platforms, by audience sizes of the platforms. (E) Average retention rates of visitors arriving by links posted on different platforms, by audience sizes of the platforms. (F) Pearson correlations between audience size and user interactions relating to on-site behaviour. *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Error bars denote the standard error of the mean. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156409.gPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0156409 May 27,10 /Engagement with Particle Physics on CERN's Social Media PlatformsTable 7. User interactions per item with CERN items on different social media platforms, by item type. Item Type GWII Mean N SD News Mean N SD TBT Mean N SD Wow Mean N SD Total Mean N SD 161.68 214 358.81 9.50 214 31.93 64.37 182 143.79 93.08 225 166.11 16.27 225 34.67 5.45 225 8.20 285.93 40 703.74 17.20 40 63.27 115.88 32 244.12 14.