Ncy differ from the two previous comparisons in that generally all

Ncy differ from the two previous comparisons in that generally all the participating women whose children’s mental development is compared here came from the same communities. They received supplements early or late in pregnancy due to the timing of supplements arriving in the community or the timing of their visit to the clinic, not due to the design of the study. Findings from two studies Win 63843 solubility showed a fairly consistent AZD0156 web benefit for early supplementation. Fierro-Benitez et al. [58] found that children whose mothers were supplemented in early pregnancy scored higher than children supplemented in the last trimester of fetal life, during lactation and directly as a newborn (Mean 80.1 vs. 67.0; p < 0.05, d = 0.86). In another study [60] they reported mental development means of children whose mothers were supplemented before conception and those supplemented in the second trimester (Mean 83.7 vs. 71.7; p not reported, d = 0.79). The average effect size across these two non-RCT that compared iodine supplementation early in pregnancy vs. late in pregnancy was d = 0.82. Summary of Intervention Studies. Intervention studies on the effects of iodine supplements on mental outcome of children 5 years old and under showed relatively consistent findings regardless of the regional or population level of iodine deficiency (Figure 2). The average effect size for randomized (d = 0.68) and non-randomized (d = 0.46) designs was 0.49. The IQ point difference was calculatedNutrients 2013,assuming a standard deviation of 15 for most intelligence tests. Consequently, an effect size of 0.49 translates into a 7.4 IQ point difference (0.49 ?15) between groups. This included a total of 16 effects across 10 studies. Most of them (15 out of 16) indicated a positive effect size. Most had targeted different periods for the supplementation, from the period prior to conception to lactation, the majority offered supplementation some time during pregnancy. Supplementation prior to or during early pregnancy benefited children more than supplements late in pregnancy. Two studies used a random assignment design and only one found a significant effect of iodine supplementation. Figure 2. Forest plot for effect size (Standard mean difference SMD and 95 confidence interval) of iodine on mental development of children, intervention studies (The studies were heterogeneous (Q = 54.81, df = 15, p < 0.0001). The random effects model was therefore more appropriate).Pretell et al. [50] Thilly et al. [51-54] Fierro-Benitez et al.[55] Fierro-Benitez et al.[56] Cao et al. [57] Berbel et al. [58] Ramirez et al.[59] Ramirez et al.[46] Trowbridge [60] Velasco et al. [61] Fierro-Benitez et al.[56] Fierro-Benitez et al.[55] Cao et al. [57] Berbel et al. [58] Fierro-Benitez et al.[56] Fierro-Benitez et al.[55] Total (fixed effects) Total (random effects)-1.-0.0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Standardized Mean Difference (SMD)2.2.3.4.3. Observational Cohort Prospective Studies Stratified by Maternal Iodine Status Mothers with normal levels of iodine in the first trimester, as assessed by various iodine biological indicators, had children with consistently better mental development outcomes. Ten studies are reported on here. Man [68,69] reported that scores of children of hypothyroxinemic inadequately treated pregnant women were different from scores of children of euthyroid pregnant women (Mean 95 vs. 101; p not reported, d = 0.40) and similarly differed from those born to adequately treated mothers (Mean 95 vs.Ncy differ from the two previous comparisons in that generally all the participating women whose children's mental development is compared here came from the same communities. They received supplements early or late in pregnancy due to the timing of supplements arriving in the community or the timing of their visit to the clinic, not due to the design of the study. Findings from two studies showed a fairly consistent benefit for early supplementation. Fierro-Benitez et al. [58] found that children whose mothers were supplemented in early pregnancy scored higher than children supplemented in the last trimester of fetal life, during lactation and directly as a newborn (Mean 80.1 vs. 67.0; p < 0.05, d = 0.86). In another study [60] they reported mental development means of children whose mothers were supplemented before conception and those supplemented in the second trimester (Mean 83.7 vs. 71.7; p not reported, d = 0.79). The average effect size across these two non-RCT that compared iodine supplementation early in pregnancy vs. late in pregnancy was d = 0.82. Summary of Intervention Studies. Intervention studies on the effects of iodine supplements on mental outcome of children 5 years old and under showed relatively consistent findings regardless of the regional or population level of iodine deficiency (Figure 2). The average effect size for randomized (d = 0.68) and non-randomized (d = 0.46) designs was 0.49. The IQ point difference was calculatedNutrients 2013,assuming a standard deviation of 15 for most intelligence tests. Consequently, an effect size of 0.49 translates into a 7.4 IQ point difference (0.49 ?15) between groups. This included a total of 16 effects across 10 studies. Most of them (15 out of 16) indicated a positive effect size. Most had targeted different periods for the supplementation, from the period prior to conception to lactation, the majority offered supplementation some time during pregnancy. Supplementation prior to or during early pregnancy benefited children more than supplements late in pregnancy. Two studies used a random assignment design and only one found a significant effect of iodine supplementation. Figure 2. Forest plot for effect size (Standard mean difference SMD and 95 confidence interval) of iodine on mental development of children, intervention studies (The studies were heterogeneous (Q = 54.81, df = 15, p < 0.0001). The random effects model was therefore more appropriate).Pretell et al. [50] Thilly et al. [51-54] Fierro-Benitez et al.[55] Fierro-Benitez et al.[56] Cao et al. [57] Berbel et al. [58] Ramirez et al.[59] Ramirez et al.[46] Trowbridge [60] Velasco et al. [61] Fierro-Benitez et al.[56] Fierro-Benitez et al.[55] Cao et al. [57] Berbel et al. [58] Fierro-Benitez et al.[56] Fierro-Benitez et al.[55] Total (fixed effects) Total (random effects)-1.-0.0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Standardized Mean Difference (SMD)2.2.3.4.3. Observational Cohort Prospective Studies Stratified by Maternal Iodine Status Mothers with normal levels of iodine in the first trimester, as assessed by various iodine biological indicators, had children with consistently better mental development outcomes. Ten studies are reported on here. Man [68,69] reported that scores of children of hypothyroxinemic inadequately treated pregnant women were different from scores of children of euthyroid pregnant women (Mean 95 vs. 101; p not reported, d = 0.40) and similarly differed from those born to adequately treated mothers (Mean 95 vs.