L.D H Vrwm Hgf\U0027vdr

Calhermeneutical method for interpreting interview text, because the aim of the process was to disclose the meaning of nurses’ experience of residents’ spiritual demands [44]. The technique of analysis was inspired by Ricoeur’s philosophy [45]. Interpretations of the text consist of a dialectic movement among understanding the whole text and parts from the text, that is consistent with the hermeneutic process [46]. This closeness and distance on the text implies interpreting the text in terms of reading the text for what it says and additional understanding what the text suggests. The evaluation followed three methods: na e reading, structural analysis and formulation of a extensive understanding.Na e reading (initial reading)Information had been collected from June 2011 to January 2012. At least one interview was performed at each in the four institutions, and also a follow-up interview was conducted. Analysis shows that recurrent expertise dialogue within a unique group may perhaps improve the understanding of a theme [40,41]. By means of possessing a follow-up interview, we wanted to receive the participants’ reflections after the initial interview and deepen many of the subjects that the nurses discussed inside the first interview [40]. The identical moderator (initially author) and observer (second author) carried out all eight interviews that had been located within the nursing houses, lasted 1 ?- 2 hours and recordedThe text was read a number of times to grasp the meaning as a complete. During the reading, we tried to focus on the nurses’ lived experiences as they reflected on the residents spiritual and existential expressions. Na e reading was discussed among the researchers and further guided the thematic structural evaluation.Structural analysisAll four researchers carried out information coding. Initial, the text was divided into meaning units. We reflected around the meaning units based around the background of PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20425085 the na e understanding then condensed the units to reflect the important meaning. We read by way of all of the condensed which means units and reflected on their similarities and variations. Sub-themes had been then created, which had been assembled to themes and main themes. We further reflected around the themes in relation to the na e understanding, andbehr et al. BMC Nursing 2014, 13:12 http://www.BFH772 web biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/13/Page 4 ofif we discovered a discrepancy amongst the na e understanding and themes, the structural evaluation process was repeated until there was compliance.Extensive understandingWe reflected around the themes and sub-themes in relation to our pre-understanding, analysis query, and also the context on the study, in which we sought a extensive understanding. The credibility with the findings was assessed inside the procedure of coding, in that we selected important sections in the participants’ statements and identified explicit themes. We sought to safeguard transparency and trustworthiness by means of quotations from distinctive participations in the presentation of the findings. Through the whole approach, we attempted to assess consistency amongst the information presented plus the study findings, such as both key and minor themes. By comparing themes to the naive reading, we strengthened the validity in the analysis.Ethical considerationsreligious activities, for example prayer and singing hymns. In addition, they observed that residents wanted to connect to them on a private level. The nurses described residents’ earlier interests, such as nature experiences, culture and traditions as spiritual wants, as.