Ith poor survival (p = 0.004, logrank test; Figure 7B). The overall survival

Ith poor survival (p = 0.004, logrank test; Figure 7B). The overall survival rate of patients with the higher levels of CDKN3 (FC .15) was 42.9 , and the median survival time was 33 months. In contrast, those with lower levels of CDKN3 had an overall survival rate of 87.5 .1426 168 25 1 0.?????Genes in bold were selected to be explored in pre-invasive samples. The analysis was performed with 44 HPV16-positive CC, 22 CC positive for other HPVs and 25 cervical controls. Fold change (FC) was calculated with the median values as follows: tumor/control for upregulated genes and control/ tumor for downregulated genes (see Materials and Methods). The difference DprE1-IN-2 site between the groups was statistically significant (p,1610215; Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) for all but 2 genes (NDN, SLC18A2). NDN and SLC18A2 had a p.0.05. c Included carcinomas positives for HPV-18 (5), -31 (5), -33 (2), -45 (5), -51 (2), -58 (2) and -59 (1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055975.tbMitosis as Source of Biomarkers in Cervical CancerMitosis as Source of Biomarkers in Cervical CancerFigure 3. Correlation of expression intensity of 18325633 23 genes examined by HG-Focus and HG-ST1.0 microarrays. The Log2 values of the standardized intensity signals (RMA values) of 23 genes examined by the 2 microarrays in 19 CC and 5 normal cervical epithelium were plotted. The linear trend (black line) is included, which was calculated with Person’s correlation test. r = correlation coefficient, p = p-value. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055975.gFIGO staging and CDKN3 expression were analyzed individually and together in Cox proportional hazard models. Because of the differences in the sample size among the FIGO stages analyzed, patients were reassigned to 2 groups, one including FIGO IB1 and IB2 (n = 30) and the other FIGO IIA, IIB, and IIIB (n = 12). Individually, the hazard ratio (HR) of CDKN3 was 5.9 (95 CI 1.4?4.1, p = 0.01) and of the grouped FIGO, 3.3 (95 CI 0.83?3.3, p = 0.08). The lack of significance in the HR of grouped FIGO could be explained by differences in the sample size and the inverted survival rates of the individual FIGO stages IB2 and IIB. When these 2 covariates were included in the same proportional hazard model, CDKN3 remained invariably significant with an HR of 5.9 (95 CI 1.4?3.8, p = 0.01). These results suggest that CDKN3 could be a prognostic factor for survival that is independent of FIGOstaging. However, a larger sample size is needed to confirm these results.Classification of Genes with Differential Expression between Cancer and Control SamplesThe DAVID functional annotation tool (http://david.abcc. ncifcrf.gov) was used at medium and highest stringency to identify the biological processes where the 997 differentially expressed genes are involved. Compared with the human genome database, the 3 most enriched clusters, and with the lowest p values at medium stringency, were cell cycle-associated processes, DNA metabolic processes, and processes associated with the regulation of ubiquitin-protein ligase activity (Table S5). Interestingly, at the highest stringency, where more tightly associated genes in each group are expected, the clusters including mitosis and M-phase ofFigure 4. Validation of gene expression of 9 genetic markers by qRT-PCR. The intensity of gene expression, expressed in Log2 values, is shown in box plots. Expression of the 6 genes validated in this study (CCNB2, PRC1, SYCP2, CDKN3, CDC20, and MedChemExpress CP21 NUSAP1) and the 3 well-known genes (CDKN2A, MKI67, and PCNA) as.Ith poor survival (p = 0.004, logrank test; Figure 7B). The overall survival rate of patients with the higher levels of CDKN3 (FC .15) was 42.9 , and the median survival time was 33 months. In contrast, those with lower levels of CDKN3 had an overall survival rate of 87.5 .1426 168 25 1 0.?????Genes in bold were selected to be explored in pre-invasive samples. The analysis was performed with 44 HPV16-positive CC, 22 CC positive for other HPVs and 25 cervical controls. Fold change (FC) was calculated with the median values as follows: tumor/control for upregulated genes and control/ tumor for downregulated genes (see Materials and Methods). The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p,1610215; Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) for all but 2 genes (NDN, SLC18A2). NDN and SLC18A2 had a p.0.05. c Included carcinomas positives for HPV-18 (5), -31 (5), -33 (2), -45 (5), -51 (2), -58 (2) and -59 (1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055975.tbMitosis as Source of Biomarkers in Cervical CancerMitosis as Source of Biomarkers in Cervical CancerFigure 3. Correlation of expression intensity of 18325633 23 genes examined by HG-Focus and HG-ST1.0 microarrays. The Log2 values of the standardized intensity signals (RMA values) of 23 genes examined by the 2 microarrays in 19 CC and 5 normal cervical epithelium were plotted. The linear trend (black line) is included, which was calculated with Person’s correlation test. r = correlation coefficient, p = p-value. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055975.gFIGO staging and CDKN3 expression were analyzed individually and together in Cox proportional hazard models. Because of the differences in the sample size among the FIGO stages analyzed, patients were reassigned to 2 groups, one including FIGO IB1 and IB2 (n = 30) and the other FIGO IIA, IIB, and IIIB (n = 12). Individually, the hazard ratio (HR) of CDKN3 was 5.9 (95 CI 1.4?4.1, p = 0.01) and of the grouped FIGO, 3.3 (95 CI 0.83?3.3, p = 0.08). The lack of significance in the HR of grouped FIGO could be explained by differences in the sample size and the inverted survival rates of the individual FIGO stages IB2 and IIB. When these 2 covariates were included in the same proportional hazard model, CDKN3 remained invariably significant with an HR of 5.9 (95 CI 1.4?3.8, p = 0.01). These results suggest that CDKN3 could be a prognostic factor for survival that is independent of FIGOstaging. However, a larger sample size is needed to confirm these results.Classification of Genes with Differential Expression between Cancer and Control SamplesThe DAVID functional annotation tool (http://david.abcc. ncifcrf.gov) was used at medium and highest stringency to identify the biological processes where the 997 differentially expressed genes are involved. Compared with the human genome database, the 3 most enriched clusters, and with the lowest p values at medium stringency, were cell cycle-associated processes, DNA metabolic processes, and processes associated with the regulation of ubiquitin-protein ligase activity (Table S5). Interestingly, at the highest stringency, where more tightly associated genes in each group are expected, the clusters including mitosis and M-phase ofFigure 4. Validation of gene expression of 9 genetic markers by qRT-PCR. The intensity of gene expression, expressed in Log2 values, is shown in box plots. Expression of the 6 genes validated in this study (CCNB2, PRC1, SYCP2, CDKN3, CDC20, and NUSAP1) and the 3 well-known genes (CDKN2A, MKI67, and PCNA) as.