Using Western blotting, we compared the expression of GPER between tumoural and normal tissues

nvolvement of AR activation by T and/or DHT. In addition, an effect on GABAA receptor can be certainly ruled out since we worked under block of GABAergic transmission. The possible influence of androstane-dioles on ER could also raise the suspicion of a role of this pathway in the induction of LTP by SIS, but activation of ERs by locally synthesized E2 appears to be the only responsible for LTP since under letrozole LTP was abolished 21802008 or inverted into LTD. Moreover, the evidence that E2-dependent LTP or androgendependent LTD can be obtained in the same MVN neurons also suggests that they have the possibility to develop either potentiation through E2 or depression through T or DHT depending on the afferent stimulation pattern. Therefore, the mechanisms for inducing LTP and LTD by sex neurosteroids seem to coexist in many MVN neurons, like supported by our recent immunohistochemical evidence of co-localization of ERs and ARs in the majority of them. Concerning the involvement of the DHT synthesis in LTD, our findings do not yet lead to its demonstration, since under inhibition of the 5-reductase LTD was still induced, even though it was prevented by the AR blockade in almost all cases. This suggests that, although the activation of androgen signaling is required for LTD, the conversion of T into DHT could not be necessary. However, we know that 1) DHT is able to induce LTD in the MVN, 2) under block of the DHT synthesis the occurrence of LTD by exogenous administration of T was reduced and 3) DHT shows a greater affinity for ARs than T. Taken together these results put forward the conversion of T into DHT during the LTD-inducing stimulation. In this view the maintenance of LTD under the block of 5-reductase can be explained by the upstream accumulation of T substituting for the lack of DHT. However, according with our previous field potential study with exogenous administration of T, we expected that accumulating T not only reduced the probability of LTD, but also increased that of LTP, owing to its transformation into E2. But this did not occur in the 15658870 present experimental condition. It may be that these different effects depend on a lower level of T elicited by the synaptic stimulation compared to that reached through exogenous administration of T, or to an inhibitory influence of the LIS pattern on the P450-aromatase. Therefore, we hypothesize that LTP can only be induced when the synthesis of E2 is activated by a specific pattern of stimulation. On the contrary, in theory LTD could be elicited by any stimulation able to increase the level of T, but not to activate the P450-aromatase. Therefore, the neural synthesis of E2 seems to be crucial for guiding vestibular synapses purchase LY3039478 toward LTP or LTD. In fact, we suggest that both inducing LTP and LTD stimulation facilitates the synthesis of T, but only the specific activation of P450-aromatase can drive the direction of synaptic change toward the potentiation. It remains to be demonstrated whether the transformation of T into DHT is also guided by specific stimulation patterns. The mechanism by which stimulation patterns may lead to production of different neurosteroids is at the moment fully unknown. We know that the E2 synthesis may be mediated by the Ca2+ influx through the NMDAR and activation of the P450-aromatase. Similarly, NMDAR dependent Ca2+ influx elevates the level of pregnenolone and pregnenolone sulphate, the first precursors of sex neurosterogenesis. But, no evidence for a Ca2+-dri