Ue {P valuet = 0.568 x2 = 1.0.57 0.x2 = 0.416 t = 0.436 t = 2.54 x2 = 10.0.519 0.663 0.011 { 0.023 {18 (52.9) 9 (26.5) 6 (17.6) 0 (0) 0.44 (0.29, 95 CI, 0.34 to 0.55 ) 0.39 (0.29, 95 CI

Ue {P valuet = 0.568 x2 = 1.0.57 0.x2 = 0.416 t = 0.436 t = 2.54 x2 = 10.0.519 0.663 0.011 { 0.023 {18 (52.9) 9 (26.5) 6 (17.6) 0 (0) 0.44 (0.29, 95 CI, 0.34 to 0.55 ) 0.39 (0.29, 95 CI, 0.29 to 0.50)1310 (39.8) 435 (13.2) 292 (8.9) 163 (5.0) 0.54 (0.25, 95 CI, 0.53 to 0.55) 0.45 (0.27, 95 CI, 0.44 to 0.46)x2 = 2.0.119 0.038 { 0.118 0.t = 22.263 t = 21.0.024 { 0.iERM, idiopathic epiretinal membrane; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; VA, visual acuity; UCDVA, uncorrected distance visual acuity. *Idiopathic epiretinal membrane was considered present in participants without a secondary cause (diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular disease, retinal detachment, or history of cataract surgery) of ERM. { t: Independent samples t-test; x2: Pearson chi-square. { P,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051445.thave been closer to the western developed countries, which might cause lower prevalence of iERM in Beixinjing Blocks. Nevertheless, some methodological issues should be mentioned. This studyused non-stereoscopic 45u retinal photographs to identify and grade iERM, whereas some other studies used 30u stereoscopic retinal photographs and/or OCT [8,23?5]. Even though weTable 3. Demographic characteristics in the 34 participants with iERM and the 34 healthy participants (control group).iERM group No. of participants Mean age (SD) years Male [No. ( )] Mean BMI (SD) Levels of education Illiterate [No. ( )] Primary Eltrombopag diethanolamine salt school [No. ( )] Junior high school [No. ( )] Senior high school [No. ( )] College or higher [No. ( )] Diabetes suffered [No. ( )] 4 (11.8) 6 (17.6) 9 (26.5) 6 (17.6) 9 (26.5) 9 (26.5) 34 72.53 (6.11) 17 (50.0) 24.15 (3.02)Control group 34 70.44 (7.90) 15 (44.1) 23.02 (3.54)Statistic value*P valuet = 1.219 x2 = 0.236 t = 1.0.227 0.627 0.4 (12.5) 3 (9.4) 10 (31.3) 7 (21.9) 8 (25) 4 (11.8)x2 = 1.0.x2 = 2.0.iERM, idiopathic epiretinal membrane; SD, standard deviation. *x2: Mantel-Haenszel chi-square; t: independent-samples t-test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051445.tPrevalence and Risk Factors of iERM in Shanghaitrained ophthalmologists to evaluate the participants for iERM, non-stereoscopic retinal photographs might have resulted in an underestimation of the prevalence of iERM by missing subtle early Elafibranor macular changes, especially CMR. Consistent with previous studies [4,8,27], our study found that diabetes was positively associated with the prevalence of iERM. Samantha and associates [8] speculated that the high prevalence of iERM (17.5 ) in their population-based study was because of its high prevalence of diabetes. These findings suggest diabetes might promote the occurrence and development of iERM. A conceivable pathological mechanism is that synchysis contributes to the precocious and exaggerated PVD in diabetics, and therefore, PVD is significantly more common in diabetics, even in the absence of retinopathy [46]. In addition to diabetes, we found that a higher level of education was associated with iERM, which was consistent with the Beijing Eye Study [24]. In contrast to previous studies, we failed to find a significant association between the prevalence of iERM and other potential risk factors, including older age [4,7,8,22?5,26,28], gender [26], and high myopia [4,8]. It was likely that the number of participants with iERM was too small in our study to detect associations with these factors. Not surprisingly, we found that presenting visual acuity was significantly worse in eyes of participants with.Ue {P valuet = 0.568 x2 = 1.0.57 0.x2 = 0.416 t = 0.436 t = 2.54 x2 = 10.0.519 0.663 0.011 { 0.023 {18 (52.9) 9 (26.5) 6 (17.6) 0 (0) 0.44 (0.29, 95 CI, 0.34 to 0.55 ) 0.39 (0.29, 95 CI, 0.29 to 0.50)1310 (39.8) 435 (13.2) 292 (8.9) 163 (5.0) 0.54 (0.25, 95 CI, 0.53 to 0.55) 0.45 (0.27, 95 CI, 0.44 to 0.46)x2 = 2.0.119 0.038 { 0.118 0.t = 22.263 t = 21.0.024 { 0.iERM, idiopathic epiretinal membrane; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; VA, visual acuity; UCDVA, uncorrected distance visual acuity. *Idiopathic epiretinal membrane was considered present in participants without a secondary cause (diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular disease, retinal detachment, or history of cataract surgery) of ERM. { t: Independent samples t-test; x2: Pearson chi-square. { P,0.05. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051445.thave been closer to the western developed countries, which might cause lower prevalence of iERM in Beixinjing Blocks. Nevertheless, some methodological issues should be mentioned. This studyused non-stereoscopic 45u retinal photographs to identify and grade iERM, whereas some other studies used 30u stereoscopic retinal photographs and/or OCT [8,23?5]. Even though weTable 3. Demographic characteristics in the 34 participants with iERM and the 34 healthy participants (control group).iERM group No. of participants Mean age (SD) years Male [No. ( )] Mean BMI (SD) Levels of education Illiterate [No. ( )] Primary school [No. ( )] Junior high school [No. ( )] Senior high school [No. ( )] College or higher [No. ( )] Diabetes suffered [No. ( )] 4 (11.8) 6 (17.6) 9 (26.5) 6 (17.6) 9 (26.5) 9 (26.5) 34 72.53 (6.11) 17 (50.0) 24.15 (3.02)Control group 34 70.44 (7.90) 15 (44.1) 23.02 (3.54)Statistic value*P valuet = 1.219 x2 = 0.236 t = 1.0.227 0.627 0.4 (12.5) 3 (9.4) 10 (31.3) 7 (21.9) 8 (25) 4 (11.8)x2 = 1.0.x2 = 2.0.iERM, idiopathic epiretinal membrane; SD, standard deviation. *x2: Mantel-Haenszel chi-square; t: independent-samples t-test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051445.tPrevalence and Risk Factors of iERM in Shanghaitrained ophthalmologists to evaluate the participants for iERM, non-stereoscopic retinal photographs might have resulted in an underestimation of the prevalence of iERM by missing subtle early macular changes, especially CMR. Consistent with previous studies [4,8,27], our study found that diabetes was positively associated with the prevalence of iERM. Samantha and associates [8] speculated that the high prevalence of iERM (17.5 ) in their population-based study was because of its high prevalence of diabetes. These findings suggest diabetes might promote the occurrence and development of iERM. A conceivable pathological mechanism is that synchysis contributes to the precocious and exaggerated PVD in diabetics, and therefore, PVD is significantly more common in diabetics, even in the absence of retinopathy [46]. In addition to diabetes, we found that a higher level of education was associated with iERM, which was consistent with the Beijing Eye Study [24]. In contrast to previous studies, we failed to find a significant association between the prevalence of iERM and other potential risk factors, including older age [4,7,8,22?5,26,28], gender [26], and high myopia [4,8]. It was likely that the number of participants with iERM was too small in our study to detect associations with these factors. Not surprisingly, we found that presenting visual acuity was significantly worse in eyes of participants with.