Remains to be determined by additional studies. Second, the samples we

Remains to be determined by additional studies. Second, the samples we examined represent end-stage disease, so we were unable to study the activation of Notch signaling during the early stages of DTAAD formation. Third, we observed significant variation in Notch levels, reflecting the heterogeneity of pathogenesis and disease progression in aortic tissue. In conclusion, the Notch signaling pathway was downregulated in medial VSMCs but activated in CD34+ stem cells, Stro-1+ stem cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages. Further studies are required to determine the role of Notch signaling in 25033180 each cell type and how theNotch Signaling in Aortic Aneurysm and Dissectionpathway is regulated. Moreover, understanding how to selectively regulate Notch signaling (ie, stimulate it in SMCs and inhibit it in inflammatory cells) may promote Notch-mediated aortic repair and reduce Notch-mediated aortic inflammation. This information may be useful in developing new treatment strategies for AAD.and Scott A. Weldon, MA, CMI, of Baylor College of Medicine, for assistance with illustrations.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: YHS SAL. Performed the experiments: SZ PR MN. Analyzed the data: SZ YHS. Wrote the paper: SZ YHS JSC SAL.AcknowledgmentsWe gratefully acknowledge Rebecca A. Bartow, PhD, of the Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, for providing editorial support,
The induction of adaptive cellular immunity is a ML-281 function of professional antigen presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells, which provide signal 1 (peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)), signal 2 (co-stimulatory molecules), and signal 3 (instructive cytokines) to naive T lymphocytes upon antigen encounter [1]. Endothelial cells (EC) form the inner lining of blood vessels and are positioned between circulating lymphocytes and peripheral tissues. As such, EC are the first cells with which T cells come into direct contact in the circulation. The hypothesis that EC may be able to act as APC is based upon the intimate interactions between EC in microvessels and T cells during transendothelial migration to lymph nodes or peripheral tissues. That is, EC may acquire antigenic proteins and present them on MHC class I and II molecules at their apical surface. The vascular EC that separate the blood stream from the brain parenchyma is referred to as the blood brain barrier (BBB). The BBB provides both anatomical and physiological protection for the central nervous system, regulating the entry of many substances and 24786787 blood borne cells into the nervous tissue. There is increasing evidence of interactions between T cells and brain endothelium in diseases such as multiple sclerosis, cerebral malaria (CM) and viral neuropathologies. Of particular note, the diameter of microvessels, where thepathology is seen during CM, is smaller than the size of activated lymphocytes; therefore the latter physically “brush” the EC AN 3199 price surface and can thus interact very closely. Additionally, during CM, both T cells and monocytes are arrested in brain microvessels [2] and we recently demonstrated that brain EC can display antigens from infected erythrocytes on their surface, thereby possibly initiating immune responses [3]. MHC expression, which is the primary requirement for APC activity has been demonstrated on EC with both MHC I and II upregulated following cytokine treatment [4?]. Moreover, EC may also qualify as APCs due to the secretion of cytokines, particularly GM-C.Remains to be determined by additional studies. Second, the samples we examined represent end-stage disease, so we were unable to study the activation of Notch signaling during the early stages of DTAAD formation. Third, we observed significant variation in Notch levels, reflecting the heterogeneity of pathogenesis and disease progression in aortic tissue. In conclusion, the Notch signaling pathway was downregulated in medial VSMCs but activated in CD34+ stem cells, Stro-1+ stem cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages. Further studies are required to determine the role of Notch signaling in 25033180 each cell type and how theNotch Signaling in Aortic Aneurysm and Dissectionpathway is regulated. Moreover, understanding how to selectively regulate Notch signaling (ie, stimulate it in SMCs and inhibit it in inflammatory cells) may promote Notch-mediated aortic repair and reduce Notch-mediated aortic inflammation. This information may be useful in developing new treatment strategies for AAD.and Scott A. Weldon, MA, CMI, of Baylor College of Medicine, for assistance with illustrations.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: YHS SAL. Performed the experiments: SZ PR MN. Analyzed the data: SZ YHS. Wrote the paper: SZ YHS JSC SAL.AcknowledgmentsWe gratefully acknowledge Rebecca A. Bartow, PhD, of the Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, for providing editorial support,
The induction of adaptive cellular immunity is a function of professional antigen presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells, which provide signal 1 (peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)), signal 2 (co-stimulatory molecules), and signal 3 (instructive cytokines) to naive T lymphocytes upon antigen encounter [1]. Endothelial cells (EC) form the inner lining of blood vessels and are positioned between circulating lymphocytes and peripheral tissues. As such, EC are the first cells with which T cells come into direct contact in the circulation. The hypothesis that EC may be able to act as APC is based upon the intimate interactions between EC in microvessels and T cells during transendothelial migration to lymph nodes or peripheral tissues. That is, EC may acquire antigenic proteins and present them on MHC class I and II molecules at their apical surface. The vascular EC that separate the blood stream from the brain parenchyma is referred to as the blood brain barrier (BBB). The BBB provides both anatomical and physiological protection for the central nervous system, regulating the entry of many substances and 24786787 blood borne cells into the nervous tissue. There is increasing evidence of interactions between T cells and brain endothelium in diseases such as multiple sclerosis, cerebral malaria (CM) and viral neuropathologies. Of particular note, the diameter of microvessels, where thepathology is seen during CM, is smaller than the size of activated lymphocytes; therefore the latter physically “brush” the EC surface and can thus interact very closely. Additionally, during CM, both T cells and monocytes are arrested in brain microvessels [2] and we recently demonstrated that brain EC can display antigens from infected erythrocytes on their surface, thereby possibly initiating immune responses [3]. MHC expression, which is the primary requirement for APC activity has been demonstrated on EC with both MHC I and II upregulated following cytokine treatment [4?]. Moreover, EC may also qualify as APCs due to the secretion of cytokines, particularly GM-C.