Mselves of infection within a period of less than two years

Mselves of infection within a period of less than two years [36]. However, when immune system activity becomes compromised, as in HIV-positive women, the elimination of concomitant infection is less efficient; a clear example lies in that described for women suffering simultaneous HIV-HPV infection whose natural history of infection becomes altered, thereby leading to the appearance of cervical lesions in less time. This is related to a reduction in HPV elimination rates, greater efficiency regarding the cellular transformation of all viral types and lower lesion regression rates [4].According to the data obtained in this study, DNA integrity confirmed by amplifying two segments of the human b lobin gene (as an indirect measurement method) revealed that the percentage of samples having 11089-65-9 site degraded or non-amplifiable DNA were low in both cervical and urine samples, thereby highlighting that the latter also represents a good source of DNA for amplifying specific targets using molecular biology techniques and could thus be considered as a useful cervical screening tool (in 15481974 spite of 30 inhibition having been reported for such amplification) [37,38]. The frequency of HPV infection detected in the present population agreed with that reported in previous studies carried out on populations having similar characteristics, such as that reported by Ferenczy et al., who described 73.6 crude HPV infection prevalence from cervical samples taken from sexuallyactive HIV-positive women [3]. Nevertheless, HPV infection prevalence in urine in the 16574785 present study was lower than that in cervical samples; similar data have been reported previously for this type of sample [39]. Such difference in viral detection percentage could have been related to the low number of exfoliated cervical cells present in urine, to the presence of PCR inhibitors in this sample [37] or to methodological issues related with sampling strategies, storage conditions, sample manipulation and DNA extraction method that could affect the 307538-42-7 chemical information HPV-DNA detection [15]; therefore is necessary to continue working on the improvement of protocols for HPV-DNA detection from urine sample. Regarding type-specific distribution, the data obtained from cervical samples agreed with published reports concerning the general Colombian population, HPV-16 being the most prevalent type, followed by HPV-31 [18]. However, urine samples’ typespecific distribution profile revealed some differences compared to that for the cervical samples, HPV-18 being the second most prevalent type, this being similar to worldwide data reported in the pertinent literature [40]. It was also found that HPV-58 and HPV45 were the only two viral types more prevalent in urine samples than in cervical samples, which could have been related to the fact that some viral types may preferentially infect the vagina’s keratinized tissue than the non-keratinized tissue of the cervix [41]; however, more research needs to be done into HPV infection profiles regarding different areas of the lower genital tract.Table 3. HPV detection and type-specific distribution from each source sample (cervical and urine) in the group of women having normal and abnormal cytological findings.Women having a normal cytology result (n = 138) n ( ) Both positive HPV infection* HPV-16 HPV-18 HPV-31 HPV-33 HPV-45 HPV-58 HPV-6/11 57 23 6 7 4 0 4 2 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 41.3 20.2 5.3 6.1 3.5 0.0 3.5 1.8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cervical sample Urine sample only only 35 41 33 31 20 7 20 20.Mselves of infection within a period of less than two years [36]. However, when immune system activity becomes compromised, as in HIV-positive women, the elimination of concomitant infection is less efficient; a clear example lies in that described for women suffering simultaneous HIV-HPV infection whose natural history of infection becomes altered, thereby leading to the appearance of cervical lesions in less time. This is related to a reduction in HPV elimination rates, greater efficiency regarding the cellular transformation of all viral types and lower lesion regression rates [4].According to the data obtained in this study, DNA integrity confirmed by amplifying two segments of the human b lobin gene (as an indirect measurement method) revealed that the percentage of samples having degraded or non-amplifiable DNA were low in both cervical and urine samples, thereby highlighting that the latter also represents a good source of DNA for amplifying specific targets using molecular biology techniques and could thus be considered as a useful cervical screening tool (in 15481974 spite of 30 inhibition having been reported for such amplification) [37,38]. The frequency of HPV infection detected in the present population agreed with that reported in previous studies carried out on populations having similar characteristics, such as that reported by Ferenczy et al., who described 73.6 crude HPV infection prevalence from cervical samples taken from sexuallyactive HIV-positive women [3]. Nevertheless, HPV infection prevalence in urine in the 16574785 present study was lower than that in cervical samples; similar data have been reported previously for this type of sample [39]. Such difference in viral detection percentage could have been related to the low number of exfoliated cervical cells present in urine, to the presence of PCR inhibitors in this sample [37] or to methodological issues related with sampling strategies, storage conditions, sample manipulation and DNA extraction method that could affect the HPV-DNA detection [15]; therefore is necessary to continue working on the improvement of protocols for HPV-DNA detection from urine sample. Regarding type-specific distribution, the data obtained from cervical samples agreed with published reports concerning the general Colombian population, HPV-16 being the most prevalent type, followed by HPV-31 [18]. However, urine samples’ typespecific distribution profile revealed some differences compared to that for the cervical samples, HPV-18 being the second most prevalent type, this being similar to worldwide data reported in the pertinent literature [40]. It was also found that HPV-58 and HPV45 were the only two viral types more prevalent in urine samples than in cervical samples, which could have been related to the fact that some viral types may preferentially infect the vagina’s keratinized tissue than the non-keratinized tissue of the cervix [41]; however, more research needs to be done into HPV infection profiles regarding different areas of the lower genital tract.Table 3. HPV detection and type-specific distribution from each source sample (cervical and urine) in the group of women having normal and abnormal cytological findings.Women having a normal cytology result (n = 138) n ( ) Both positive HPV infection* HPV-16 HPV-18 HPV-31 HPV-33 HPV-45 HPV-58 HPV-6/11 57 23 6 7 4 0 4 2 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 41.3 20.2 5.3 6.1 3.5 0.0 3.5 1.8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cervical sample Urine sample only only 35 41 33 31 20 7 20 20.